Compare against
uplika vs Ayrshare
Ayrshare has no free tier; the entry plan is a 28-day trial and then $149 a month for one social profile. Its MCP server authenticates with the same API key the REST API uses, passed as a bearer header. Ours issues a token through an OAuth authorization server instead, so nothing is pasted into the agent. You may see Ayrshare quoted at $49 a month elsewhere, including one of Upload-Post's pages; we cite the $149 on Ayrshare's own pricing page.
What publishes today
Threads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram. Naver Blog publishes through the uplika Chrome extension in your own browser. TikTok is waiting on platform review: its real limits are listed so you can build against them now, and publishing there is refused rather than dropped quietly. We list fewer channels than the products below. If you need one we do not have, they cover more.
How they describe themselves
Unified Social Media API for Apps, Platforms, and AI Agents
Their sentence, unedited. Summarising a competitor's own positioning is how it gets bent.
Side by side
| uplika | Ayrshare | |
|---|---|---|
| Channels listed | 8 | 13 |
| Publishing today | Threads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram | 13 |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Paid starts at | $10/mo | $149/mo |
| Billed per | Workspace | Active social profile |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Agent authentication | OAuth, client registers itself | API key in a header |
| MCP tools | 61 | 27 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Interface languages | en, ko | en |
Checked on 2026-09-29 · Prices and channel lists change. If that date looks old, trust their page over ours.
Sources
These are the pages we read, not a bibliography we assembled afterwards. Open them and check.