Compare against
uplika vs Buffer
Buffer is a scheduling app first. It keeps a free plan (3 channels, 10 scheduled posts each) and prices paid plans per channel, from $5 a month billed yearly. Its developer docs say the hosted MCP server takes an API key in an Authorization header; a Buffer article describes OAuth, so we cite the docs and note the difference. The docs give no channel count; 12 is the list on its homepage and pricing page.
What publishes today
Threads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram. Naver Blog publishes through the uplika Chrome extension in your own browser. TikTok is waiting on platform review: its real limits are listed so you can build against them now, and publishing there is refused rather than dropped quietly. We list fewer channels than the products below. If you need one we do not have, they cover more.
How they describe themselves
Your social media workspace
Their sentence, unedited. Summarising a competitor's own positioning is how it gets bent.
Side by side
| uplika | Buffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Channels listed | 8 | 12 |
| Publishing today | Threads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram | 12 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Paid starts at | $10/mo | $5/mo |
| Billed per | Workspace | Social channel |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Agent authentication | OAuth, client registers itself | API key in a header |
| MCP tools | 54 | Not confirmed |
| Open source | No | Not confirmed |
| Interface languages | en, ko | en, es, fr, de, it, nl, pt |
Checked on 2026-09-30 · Prices and channel lists change. If that date looks old, trust their page over ours.
Sources
These are the pages we read, not a bibliography we assembled afterwards. Open them and check.