Compare against

uplika vs Upload-Post

Upload-Post keeps a permanent free tier (10 uploads a month, no card) and prices paid plans by profile, from $24 a month. Its Claude page says the hosted MCP server signs in with OAuth, its llms.txt says API key or OAuth, and its MCP repository uses an API key, so we list both. Its own pages give 22 platforms, 14 (MCP repository) or name 13 (docs), and 50 or 58 tools; we cite 22 and 50, the figures it states most often. The MCP server code is MIT-licensed; the service itself is not stated as open source.

What publishes today

Threads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram. Naver Blog publishes through the uplika Chrome extension in your own browser. TikTok is waiting on platform review: its real limits are listed so you can build against them now, and publishing there is refused rather than dropped quietly. We list fewer channels than the products below. If you need one we do not have, they cover more.

How they describe themselves

Publish videos, photos, text and documents to TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, X (Twitter), Threads, Pinterest, Reddit, Bluesky, Discord, Telegram and Google Business Profile with a single REST call.

Their sentence, unedited. Summarising a competitor's own positioning is how it gets bent.

Side by side

uplikaUpload-Post
Channels listed822
Publishing todayThreads, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Bluesky, Telegram22
Free tierYesYes
Paid starts at$10/mo$24/mo
Billed perWorkspaceActive social profile
MCP serverYesYes
Agent authenticationOAuth, client registers itselfAPI key or OAuth
MCP tools5450
Open sourceNoMIT (MCP server only)
Interface languagesen, koNot confirmed

Checked on 2026-09-30 · Prices and channel lists change. If that date looks old, trust their page over ours.

Sources

These are the pages we read, not a bibliography we assembled afterwards. Open them and check.